Human rights in action – a toolkit for change

What is the toolkit?

This toolkit is an introductory resource on human rights in the UK. It is aimed at anyone working in the voluntary and community sector in the UK, in particular those campaigning and providing advocacy on equalities issues. In will also be of general use for anyone wanting to know about how human rights apply to UK issues. It provides basic and practical information about what human rights are, how they are relevant to the voluntary and community sector and how you can effectively apply them in your work.

Why has it been produced?

Consultation carried out by BIHR and others has revealed a huge appetite among voluntary and community sector organisations for information about human rights. Skills and knowledge in human rights language, law and practice can support the voluntary and community sector to be more effective in:

However, we also know that there are low levels of awareness among voluntary and community sector organisations of what human rights are and how they can be applied in practice. This toolkit seeks to address this gap by providing practical information about human rights and their application in the UK.

How do I use it?

The toolkit is available to be read online or alternatively as a downloadable pdf (available soon). The chapters contain a mixture of information, practical exercises and tools.

We suggest that you work through each chapter in turn. As you start to apply human rights in your work, we hope that you will find it useful to return to particular chapters for reference. 

How has it been produced?

This toolkit has been produced by BIHR with support and funding from Capacity Builders, through the National Support Service. BIHR has been providing training and support on human rights to voluntary and community sector organisations for over 10 years, and the content of this toolkit has been strongly influenced by this experience. This initial version of the toolkit was published in 2010. We see it as a living document, and over a 12 month period it will be tested out with a range of voluntary and community sector organisations. Based on feedback we receive, a new version will be produced in 2011. We also plan to expand the toolkit with additional chapters.

If you have any ideas, suggestions or comments on the toolkit we’d love to hear from you! Please complete our online evaluation form or contact us on ewilcox@bihr.org.uk with any feedback.

Chapter 1: Introducing human rights

1.1 What are human rights?

Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity.

Mother Teresa

Human rights belong to everyone. They are the basic rights we all have simply because we are human, regardless of who we are, where we live or what we do. Human rights represent all the things we need to flourish and live together as human beings. They are expressed in internationally agreed laws, and cover many aspects of everyday life ranging from the rights to food, shelter, education and health to freedoms of thought, religion and expression.

The roots and origins of human rights and the struggles to bring them about lie deep in the history of many different societies, civilisations and individuals. However, the first universally agreed statement of human rights did not emerge until 1948, with the ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ (UDHR). The UDHR is the most famous, most translated, and probably most important, human rights document. All other human rights laws take the UDHR as their starting point – it is the foundation of modern human rights law.

1.2 What human rights do we have?

Practical exercise

Draw up a list of all the human rights you think we have. It might help to think about what you think people need in order to survive and flourish.

Here are a couple of examples to start you off:

  • the right to life
  • the right to education

When you have finished, follow this link to take a look at the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

How does your list compare? Are there any surprises? Are there any rights that you think are missing, or any that you think shouldn’t be included?

1.3 Who has responsibilities for human rights?

Human rights are based on the principle that we all have human rights – we are all ‘rights holders’. When an individual has a right, there is a corresponding ‘duty bearer’, usually the state, who is responsible for making sure that right is respected, protected and fulfilled. By the state, in broad terms we mean the government and those acting on its behalf. Human rights prevent states from doing certain things, like not treating you in a degrading way. They also require states to take certain actions to make sure your rights are protected and fulfilled, like taking steps to protect your life and improve your quality of life.

This doesn’t mean that human rights have nothing to say about the responsibilities of individuals, or our relationships with each other. Human rights recognise that we all live alongside each other, and everyone else has rights too. If we compromise others’ human rights, we are subject to laws that may limit our own rights as a result. For example, if someone is convicted of burgling your home, it is likely that they will be sent to jail, restricting their right to liberty. We will explore the concept of balancing rights, and when they can be limited or restricted, in more detail in chapter 3.

Move onto the next chapter to find out more about human rights laws and how they work in practice.

Key things you need to know about human rights

  • Human rights belong to everyone
  • They are expressed in internationally agreed laws
  • They are based on core values including fairness, respect, equality, dignity and autonomy
  • The ideas behind human rights have developed gradually through history and come from many different societies and civilisations
  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) was the first internationally agreed statement of human rights
  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is the starting point for all modern human rights laws
  • Human rights laws place duties on states to respect, protect and fulfil our human rights

Chapter 2: How do human rights work – the legal overview

There are three layers of human rights protection in the UK – domestic, regional and international. These are enforced and monitored in different ways.

Human Rights legal overview

2.1 The Human Rights Act and the European Convention on Human Rights

The Human Rights Act came into force in the UK on 2 October 2000. The Act brings most of the rights contained in the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law. The European Convention on Human Rights, which UK lawyers and civil servants helped to draft, was agreed in 1950 by the Council of Europe. The UK signed up to this Convention in 1951. The list of the rights it contains can be found here.

Key things you need to know about the Human Rights Act:

  • The Human Rights Act places all public authorities in the UK, such as NHS Trusts, local authorities and central government departments, under a duty to respect the rights it contains in everything that they do.

    What is a public authority?

    Reveal practical exercise: what is a public authority?

    Who is actually covered by the term public authority? Move over the boxes below and see if you can work out which organisations are public authorities.

    National Health Service

    National Health Service

    National Health Service

    Yes! One of the most obvious ones on the list.

    Supermarkets

    Supermarkets

    Supermarkets

    Nope! Food may be essential, but selling it doesn’t count as a public service.

    The Police

    The Police

    Yes! Police uphold and enforce the laws of the state.

    Transport for London

    Transport for London

    Transport for London

    Yes! Keeping London’s transport service moving is no private task – especially in a city of over 7.5 million people!

    Banks

    Banks

    Banks

    Nope! While the bank bailouts may confuse this option, banks are definitely private organisations.

    Private residential care homes

    Private residential care homes

    Private residential care homes

    It depends… If the service provided by the care home is state-funded then Yes! If the care home is purely private then Nope!

    State Schools

    State Schools

    State Schools

    Yes! State schools perform a public service by providing free education for all.

    National Newspapers

    National Newspapers

    National Newspapers

    Nope! National media newspapers pride themselves on their distinct separation from the organs of state power.

    You

    You

    You

    Do you perform a public service on behalf of the state? If you answered yes then you have duties under the Human Rights Act 1998!

  • The Human Rights Act makes it possible for individuals to bring human rights cases in ordinary UK courts and tribunals
  • Before this, you had to go to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg to claim your rights
  • You can still take a case to the European Court, but now that the Human Rights Act is in force your case has to go through the UK courts first
  • All laws in the UK have to be interpreted and applied in a way that fits with the Human Rights Act (as far as possible)

These points are covered in more detail in our factsheet on ‘How the Human Rights Act works’.

It’s also very important to remember that the Human Rights Act is not just about the law and taking cases to court. As the later chapters in this toolkit demonstrate, the Act is relevant to many of the decisions people make and the situations people experience on a daily basis. We hope the toolkit will encourage you to use the Human Rights Act ‘beyond the courtroom’ in your advocacy for individuals and in your wider campaigning and lobbying work.

2.2 The UN human rights treaties

The UK has signed up to a series of international human rights treaties (also called Conventions or Covenants) agreed by the United Nations. These treaties place legal obligations on the states that sign up to them, in contrast to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which is not a legally binding document. The text of these treaties can be found on the website of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.

Key things you need to know about the UN human rights treaties:

You can find out more about the UN human rights treaties by downloading our factsheet on the international human rights system.

2.3. Different laws, different rights

As you’ll have seen from the above, one of the key differences between the different human rights laws is the way they are monitored and enforced. Another important difference is the rights they contain.

Practical exercise

As explained earlier, the Human Rights Act and the European Convention on Human Rights contain virtually the same set of rights. However, now compare the list of rights contained in the European Convention with the rights contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (it might be easiest if you print them out).

Do you notice any differences? Do you think there are any important rights that are left out of the European Convention?

You will probably have noticed that the list of rights in the European Convention is much smaller than the UDHR. You may have also noticed that a number of rights that are missing are related to economic and social issues, such as the right to health and the right to a minimum standard of living. This is currently a gap in our human rights protection. However, some of the rights contained in the European Convention, such as the right to respect for private and family life, can still be used to tackle everyday economic and social issues.

Since the rights contained in the European Convention are enforceable in the UK courts through the Human Rights Act, these are the rights that voluntary and community sector organisations can currently use most directly in their work, particularly with regards to advocacy. Therefore, the next two chapters focus on some of these rights in more detail. However, it is important to remember that at an international level there is a more widely recognised set of rights that provide a wide range of exciting campaigning and lobbying opportunities.

Before moving on to the next section, test your knowledge so far with our human rights quiz.

Testing your knowledge so far: Human rights quiz

Practical exercise

Testing your knowledge so far: Human rights quiz

(You will need to have read the factsheets on the Human Rights Act and the international human rights system to be able to answer all of the questions)

Click on the question to reveal the answer.

1. Who do human rights belong to?

Everyone.

2. What is the name of the first internationally agreed human rights document, and in what year was it agreed?

Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948.

3. Do individuals have responsibilities under human rights laws?

Not unless they are acting on behalf of the state, for example working as a teacher, nurse or police officer. Human rights laws do not place legal responsibilities on private individuals.

4. What is the relationship between the Human Rights Act and the European Convention on Human Rights?

The Human Rights Act brings the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law. The rights they contain are virtually identical, although the Human Rights Act does not include Article 13 of the Convention, the right to an effective remedy. The reason the government gave for not including this right was that the Human Rights Act itself provides the effective remedy by allowing individuals to claim their rights in UK Courts.

5. What difference does the Human Rights Act make for individuals?

The Human Rights Act means that individuals can claim the human rights contained in the European Convention in courts and tribunals in the UK. Prior to this, individuals would have had to take their claim to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France. This makes human rights more accessible for people in the UK – it is generally quicker, cheaper and more practical to bring your case before the UK courts.

6. Who has responsibilities under the Human Rights Act?

The Human Rights Act places all public authorities in the UK under a duty to respect the rights it contains in everything that they do. The term public authority includes the NHS, social services, the police and central, regional and local government, and, more generally, any person or organisation that performs ‘functions of a public nature’.

7. Who is responsible for monitoring and enforcing international human rights treaties?

Each international human rights treaty has an associated Committee of Experts at the United Nations that is responsible for monitoring and enforcement. For example, the Committee Against Torture monitors and enforces the Convention Against Torture. Voluntary and commuity sector organisations also have a role to play by sending evidence and information to the committees about the realities on the ground and can also contribute to or write ‘shadow reports’ – see chapter 7.

8. What are the three main ways in which the international human rights treaties are monitored and enforced?

  1. State reports – states are required to submit reports to the relevant committee every 4 – 5 years. Non-governmental organisations can also submit shadow reports alongside the official state reports.
  2. Individual complaints mechanisms through which individuals can make complaints to the relevant committee that their rights have been violated.
  3. Committees produce General Comments which guide how the treaties should be interpreted and implemented.

Chapter 3: Different rights – a balancing act?

3.1 Introduction

So far we have explored the ideas behind human rights, where human rights come from and the human rights legal framework that protects them. The next two chapters look at specific rights in more detail and how they operate. In order to do this, it is important to understand the difference between absolute and non-absolute rights.

Some human rights are absolute. They must never be limited or restricted in any way.

However, the majority of rights are non-absolute and can be limited or restricted in certain circumstances where there is a need to take into account the rights of other individuals or wider society.

What is meant by limiting or restricting a right?

Limiting or restricting a right means doing something that prevents someone from fully enjoying the right. For example, if you lock someone in a room or cell you are limiting their right to liberty; they cannot fully enjoy the freedom to move about as they wish.

Practical exercise

Absolute or not absolute?

Think about the following three rights:

The right not to be tortured or treated in an inhuman or degrading way

The right not to be tortured or treated in an inhuman or degrading way is an absolute right. It can never be limited or restricted as there are no circumstances where this type of treatment of people can be justified.

The right to liberty

The right to liberty is not absolute. For example, if someone has mental health issues they may be sectioned under mental health legislation for their safety and/or the safety of others, thus limiting their right to liberty.

The right to respect for family life

The right to respect for family life is not absolute. For example, if staff at a residential care home have evidence that one of their residents is being abused by a family member, they may supervise or, in extreme circumstances, ban family visits to protect the resident from abuse. This would restrict the right to respect for family life.

Which of these rights do you think are absolute and which are non-absolute? For any non-absolute rights, can you think of an example where they would need to be limited or restricted? Click on the rights to reveal the answers.

3.2 Absolute rights

There are a small number of human rights that cannot be balanced against the rights of others, or the interests of the wider community. These are known as absolute rights. These rights can never be limited or restricted, whatever the circumstances – even in a state of war or emergency.

There are only a very few absolute rights. One example is the right not to be tortured or treated in an inhuman or degrading way. It is never ok to torture you or treat you in an inhuman or degrading way, regardless of the circumstances.

3.3 Non-absolute rights

The majority of human rights are non-absolute and can be limited or restricted in certain circumstances. There are two main types of non-absolute rights – limited rights and qualified rights.

Limited rights can be limited in specific and finite circumstances. These circumstances are set out in full in the Human Rights Act. An example of a limited right is the right to liberty. The circumstances in which the right to liberty can be limited include being sent to jail after committing a crime, or being detained under mental health legislation.

Qualified rights can be restricted under more general circumstances – they can be balanced against the rights of others or the interests of the wider community. Examples of qualified rights include the right to respect for private and family life, the right to freedom of expression and the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion.

 

Any interference with a qualified right must be:

If a public authority limits or restricts a qualified right contained in the Human Rights Act without adhering to the above four steps, they will be acting unlawfully.

Proportionality

A proportionate action is one that is reasonable and not excessive in the circumstances. The principle of proportionality is central to the human rights framework. It helps to ensure that any interference with a right is kept to a minimum.

Certain questions can be asked to help decide if an action is proportionate:

A straightforward way of thinking about proportionality is ‘you must not use a sledgehammer to crack a nut’.

Explaining proportionality – a scenario

A care home takes a decision to have a blanket policy of placing CCTV in the bedrooms of all residents, for safety reasons.

Outcome

This interferes with the right to respect for private life of all residents.

A more proportionate alternative would be:

A decision is made that only residents who pose a risk to themselves and/or others will have CCTV placed in their rooms. This decision will be made on a case by case basis, take into account the views of the residents and other appropriate people and be regularly reviewed.

Outcome

Some residents have their right to respect for private life interfered with for their own safety or the safety of others; other residents do not have their right to respect for private life interfered with.

3.4 Which rights are absolute?

Only a very few rights are absolute, as show in the table below. Please use this categorisation as a guide only, as there are some slightly ‘grey areas’!

For example, in general the right to life is absolute – it is one of our most fundamental rights, and the state must not take away the life of individuals. However, it is occasionally possible for the state to justify its actions, for example to defend oneself or someone else from unlawful violence. Some of these ‘grey areas’ are looked at in more detail in the next chapter, where we explore how specific rights work in practice.

Absolute rights

Non-absolute rights

  • Article 2: The right to life
  • Article 3: The right not to be tortured or treated in an inhuman or degrading way
  • Article 4 (1) The right to be free from slavery
  • Article 7: No punishment without law
  • Article 4 (2): The right to be free from forced labour
  • Article 5: The right to liberty (limited)
  • Article 6: The right to a fair trial
  • Article 8: The right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence (qualified)
  • Article 9: The right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion (qualified)
  • Article 10: The right to freedom of expression (qualified)
  • Article 11: The right to freedom of assembly and association (qualified)
  • Article 12: The right to marry and found a family (qualified)
  • Article 1, Protocol 1: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions (qualified)
  • Article 2, Protocol 2: The right to education
  • Article 3, Protocol 2: The right to free and fair elections

 

Absolute and non-absolute rights – key points

  • A small number of rights are absolute. This means they can never be limited or restricted in any way.
  • Non-absolute rights can be limited or restricted in certain circumstances.
  • There are two main types of non-absolute rights – limited and qualified rights.
  • Limited rights can be limited in specific and finite circumstances.
  • Qualified rights can be limited or restricted in more general circumstances, in order to protect the rights of others or wider society.
  • An interference with a qualified right must be lawful, for a legitimate aim, necessary and proportionate.
  • A proportionate response is one that is reasonable and not excessive in the circumstances.

 

Chapter 4: Rights in practice

Introduction

This section explores some of the rights in more detail. We have focused on the rights in the Human Rights Act that have been used most widely by voluntary and community sector organisations in the UK.

However, don’t forget that there are a number of other rights contained in the Human Rights Act that may be relevant for your work, and there is also a broader range of rights contained in international human rights treaties.

Article 2: Right to life

Some relevant issues

  • Protection from abuse (e.g. domestic violence)
  • Euthanasia
  • Do Not Resuscitate orders (DNR)
  • Provision of life prolonging/saving treatment
  • Advance Directives/living wills
  • Deaths through negligence
  • Inquests

The right to life is one of the most fundamental human rights, and has two main aspects. Public authorities must:

  • not take away anyone’s life, except in a very few limited circumstances. These are to defend someone from unlawful violence; to arrest someone or stop them escaping; or to suppress a riot.
  • take reasonable steps to protect life. This includes taking steps to protect someone whose life is at risk from another person, where the authorities know or should know of this risk.

You have an absolute right to have your life protected by law. However, this does not mean that public authorities always have to do everything they can to save someone’s life whatever the circumstances. The positive obligation to protect life must not be interpreted in a way that places an impossible or disproportionate burden on public authorities. So, for example, there is not an absolute right to life-prolonging treatment in all circumstances.

Case example

A woman was discharged from a mental health hospital in London before she felt ready. She had suicidal tendencies and was anxious about a delay in arranging a follow-up care review meeting. Her advocate used the right to life to argue that her care and treatment team was under a positive obligation to protect her life by ensuring she had the support she needed. She was initially supplied with a support worker once a fortnight, but as a result of these arguments, it was agreed to increase this to once a week.

Source: Cambridge House Advocacy in ‘The Human Rights Act – Changing Lives’ (BIHR 2008)

Article 3: Prohibition of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment

Some relevant issues:

  • Severe neglect or abuse
  • Failure to protect others from abuse
  • Severe bullying or harassment
  • Washing or dressing without regard to dignity
  • Excessive force used to restrain people
  • Unsanitary conditions/lack of access to sanitary facilities
  • Poor conditions in e.g. care homes, hospitals, social housing, immigration detention centres

The right not to be tortured or treated in an inhuman or degrading way is an absolute right. It cannot be limited or restricted in any way, in any circumstances. At the core of this right is human dignity.

  • Inhuman treatment is treatment causing severe mental or physical harm
  • Degrading treatment is treatment that is grossly humiliating and undignified
  • Torture is less likely to be relevant for voluntary and community sector organisations working in the UK.

While torture has to be intentionally inflicted, neither inhuman nor degrading treatment has to be deliberate – it is the impact it has on the person that matters. So, for example, if a patient in a hospital is unintentionally left for long periods in soiled bed sheets because the hospital is understaffed, this may still amount to inhuman or degrading treatment.

Only the most serious kinds of ill treatment are covered by this right. Whether the treatment is serious enough to be inhuman or degrading (or indeed torture) will depend on the particular circumstances of the case.

Case example

A larger woman in a residential care home had not showered or bathed for many weeks. The care home had been providing her instead with a ‘strip’ wash so that staff did not have to lift her. The woman was very upset about the situation. After receiving BIHR training, her advocate wrote to the care home and the local authority, challenging this as a breach of her right not to be treated in an inhuman or degrading way. Within days a new occupational therapist was brought in to explore options and it was quickly agreed that a hoist could be used. From this point onwards the woman was able to take a bath or shower according to her wishes.

Source: Cambridge House Advocacy in ‘The Human Rights Act – Changing Lives’ (BIHR 2008)

Article 5: Right to liberty

Some relevant issues

  • Informal detention of people who do not have the capacity to decide whether they would like to be admitted into hospital or residential care
  • Delays in reviewing whether mental health patients who are detained under the Mental Health Act should still be detained
  • Excessive restraint e.g. being tied to beds or chairs for long periods
  • Locked doors in hospital wards, residential care homes etc.
  • Unlawful detention of asylum seekers in detention centres

The right to liberty is not a right to do whatever you want, which is how people sometimes interpret it! It has a much narrower meaning – it is a right not to be locked in a cell or room, or have any other extreme restriction placed on your movement.

The right to liberty is a limited right. It can be restricted in tightly defined circumstances, including being sent to prison for committing a crime, and the lawful detention of people with mental health issues. The right to liberty establishes minimum safeguards and says that certain procedures (such as review mechanisms) must be in place to make sure that any restrictions on the right to liberty are lawful.

Case example

A man in a mental health hospital was repeatedly told by nurses that he could not leave the ward, even though as an informal patient he was entitled to do so. He was not detained under the Mental Health Act, so should be free to leave at any time. His advocate made a written complaint on his behalf arguing that his right to liberty had been breached. Subsequently his treatment by the nurses greatly improved and he was permitted to leave when he wanted to. He was discharged from hospital soon afterwards.

Source: Cambridge House Advocacy in ‘The Human Rights Act – Changing Lives’ (BIHR 2008)

Article 8: Right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence

Some relevant issues

  • Separation of families e.g. child protection, care home placements
  • Personal and sexual relationships
  • Physical and mental well-being
  • Privacy
  • Restrictions on making personal choices and decisions
  • Access to social and recreational activities
  • Participation in community life
  • Independent living
  • Monitoring and surveillance
  • Access to personal information and confidentiality
  • Care home closures

This right is very broad-ranging and protects four interests:

  • Family life covers close and personal ties of a family kind. It does not just cover blood ties or formal relationships. It includes a right to develop normal family relationships and the right to ongoing contact if a family is split up
  • Private life is defined particularly broadly and covers issues such as privacy, personal choices, relationships, physical and mental well-being, access to personal information and participation
  • Home can include residential care homes or other institutions if you have lived there for a significant period of time. It is a right to respect for the home you already have, rather than an actual right to housing.
  • Correspondence covers all forms of communication including phone calls, letters, faxes and emails.

This right is a qualified right. It can be limited or restricted in certain circumstances to protect the rights of others or the interests of the wider community. For example, a child may be separated from their parents if there is evidence of child abuse. Any interference with this right must be lawful, necessary and proportionate.

Case example

A husband and wife had lived together for over 65 years. He was unable to walk unaided and relied on his wife to help him move around. She was blind and used her husband as her eyes. They were separated after he fell ill and was moved into a residential care home. She asked to come with him, but was told by the local authority that she did not fit the criteria. A public campaign launched by the family argued that the local authority had breached the couple’s right to respect for family life. The authority agreed to reverse its decision and offered the wife a subsidised place so that she could join her husband in the care home.

Source: The Human Rights Act – Changing Lives (BIHR, 2008)

Article 14: The right not to be discriminated against

Some relevant issues

Discrimination on a range of grounds, including (but not limited to):

  • sex
  • race
  • colour
  • language
  • religion
  • political or other opinion
  • national or social origin
  • association with a national minority
  • property
  • birth
  • disability
  • age
  • sexual orientation
  • marital status
  • illegitimacy
  • trade union membership
  • transsexualism
  • imprisonment

Discrimination under Article 14 occurs when someone is treated in a different manner compared with others in a similar situation, or where a person with different needs is treated in the same way, regardless of those needs. However not all differential treatment will be considered to be discrimination, only that which cannot be objectively and reasonably justified. The definition can therefore allow for positive discrimination in some circumstances.

The differential treatment must relate to a person’s status in order to be considered discrimination. Crucially, Article 14 provides protection against discrimination on any ‘other status’ as well as a number of specific grounds including sex, race and religion. The term ‘other status’ is non-exhaustive and has been found to include, among other things sexual orientation, illegitimacy, marital status, trade union membership, transsexualism and imprisonment.

A current limitation is that this is not a free-standing right. It has to be linked to one of the other rights contained in the Act. So, for example, if an older person is denied life-saving medical treatment because of their age, this may be a breach of the right to life alongside the right to be protected from discrimination.

Case example

A mental health hospital frequently sectioned asylum seekers who spoke little or no English without the use of an interpreter. After participating in a BIHR session, members of a user-led mental health befriending scheme used human rights language to successfully challenge this practice. They argued that it breached the asylum seekers’ right not to be discriminated against on the basis of language and their right to liberty.

Source: The Human Rights Act – Changing Lives (BIHR 2008)

More examples of how these rights have been applied in practice can be found at Our Human Rights Stories and in The Human Rights Act – Changing Lives (BIHR 2008).

Move on to the next chapter to practise applying your knowledge of these rights to real life case studies.

Chapter 5: Case studies

This chapter will help you start to put your learning into practice. Have a look at the five case studies below, and see if you can work out how you could apply human rights thinking to the issues they raise. For each case study it will be helpful to think about the following questions:

You might find it helpful to use the below table when noting your answers. We have given you model answers for each case study – try not to look at the answers before you have had a go yourself!

Human Rights Approach Case Study Worksheet

Relevant rights  
Duty bearers (e.g. local authority, NHS Trust, police)  
Absolute/non-absolute rights  
Are limitations/restrictions lawful?  
Suggested action?  

Please note that the suggested answers we have given are a guide only and should not be interpreted as legal advice for any situation. Each individual situation is very different and whether or not it would be found to be a breach of the Human Rights Act in a legal case would depend on the individual circumstances of the case. However, the vast majority of human rights issues are resolved long before they reach the courts, and we hope that this toolkit will encourage you to use human rights beyond the courtroom to find practical solutions to everyday issues as well as in your wider campaigns and advocacy.

CASE STUDIES AND ANSWERS

Click on Reveal answers for the corresponding case study to view the answers.

Tyrone (housing; anti-social behaviour; policing; racism)

Case Study - Tyrone

Tyrone and his family live in local authority housing and have been suffering serious racial abuse by their neighbours for the last six months. The abuse has involved verbal attacks, graffiti on their property and on two occasions Tyrone’s ten year old son Sean has been threatened with a physical attack on his way home from school. The family has complained to the authority on a number of occasions, both by telephone and in writing. They have also approached the police who have not taken any action. The housing department says it is impossible to move them at the present time. Tyrone becomes so scared for the safety of his family that he takes them to stay with friends.

Reveal answers - Tyrone

Relevant rights
  • Article 8: right to respect for private and family life and home (Tyrone and his family)
  • Article 14: Right not to be discriminated against (Tyrone and his family)
  • Article 1, Protocol 1: Right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions And potentially (if the situation escalates)
  • Article 2: Right to life (Tyrone and his family)
  • Article 3: Right not to be treated in an inhuman or degrading way (Tyrone and his family)
Duty bearers (e.g. local authority, NHS Trust, police)
  • The local authority and the police both have a positive obligation to protect Tyrone and his family from this kind of treatment.
Absolute/non-absolute rights
  • Articles 2 and 3 are absolute. The other rights are not absolute.
Are limitations/restrictions lawful?
  • The local authority and police have a positive duty to protect the rights of Tyrone and his family. Given that they have taken very little if any action to support the family it would be difficult for them to argue that they had taken adequate measures to protect their rights.
Suggested action?
  • Anyone facing a similar situation could point out in their complaints to the local authority and the police that this is a potential breach of the human rights listed above and explain why.
  • The local authority and police have a positive obligation to protect the family, and should step in before the situation becomes even more serious rather than waiting until further human rights issues arise.

Polly (education; young people; disability; participation)

Case Study - Polly

A teacher at a state primary school organises a series of class excursions to museums around London. As well as complementing history and other lessons, the excursions are designed to introduce the children to educational activities in the city and to encourage bonding between students outside of the classroom. Polly, a student in the class, is a wheelchair user. She is transported to and from school in a specially adapted vehicle provided by the local authority. Polly is keen to participate in the excursions, and asks the local authority if they can arrange transport for her. However, the local authority refuses, saying they only provide transport on a ‘home to school’ basis. As a result Polly is unable to participate in the series of excursions and instead spends the time alone in the school library. She feels dejected and isolated.

Reveal answers - Polly

Relevant rights
  • Article 8: The right to respect for private life (Polly)
  • Article 2, Protocol 1: The right to education (Polly)
  • Article 14: The right not to be discriminated against (Polly)
Duty bearers (e.g. local authority, NHS Trust, police)
  • The local authority
  • The school
Absolute/non-absolute rights
  • None of these rights are absolute.
Are limitations/restrictions lawful?
  • Article 8 is a qualified right. In order to respond in a proportionate manner the local authority should consider whether they could be flexible in this case. The school should also consider whether it is appropriate to continue with activities that not all students are able to access.
Suggested action?
  • The school could support Polly and challenge the local authority’s decision using the human rights listed above.
  • If the local authority cannot be persuaded the school could consider whether they can provide transport for themselves, or arrange alternative activities that Polly can take part in.

Clare (planning; environment; community life)

Case Study - Clare

Clare lives with her family near a busy airport. Recently the airport has started to run night flights with planes taking off and landing from 3am in the morning. From this time a plane takes off or lands approximately ten times per hour.

The increased noise levels are very disruptive to the family’s sleep patterns. Clare has two young children, Molly and Sam. Sam is two years old and is afraid of the sound the planes make. After six months the lack of sleep begins to affect Clare who is prescribed anti-depressants by her GP. She receives a letter from the council informing her that due to the success of the night flights and in particular its positive impact on the local economy they are planning on introducing flights 24 hours a day. They are consulting the local communities on this development and people have three weeks to voice any concerns.

Reveal answers - Clare

Relevant rights
  • Article 8: the right to respect for private and family life (Clare, Molly and Sam – and potentially other members of the community)
  • Article 6: the right to a fair trial (all affected members of the community)
Duty bearers (e.g. local authority, NHS Trust, police)
  • The Council has a duty to consider the impact of its decisions on the rights of the local community. The right to a fair trial also needs to be taken into account in the consultation process. Is 3 weeks an adequate amount of time? How are they going to ensure all members of the community are involved in the process?
Absolute/non-absolute rights
  • Neither Article 8 or Article 6 are absolute
Are limitations/restrictions lawful?
  • Article 8 is a qualified right. The night flights are clearly having a strong impact on Clare’s private and family life and this is likely to be the same for other members of the community. The Council needs to take this into account in their decision making process and balance this with any positive impact it would have on the local economy. Have they considered any other options?
Suggested action?
  • In their submissions to the consultation local residents could raise human rights concerns.
  • The local residents could request that the council extend its consultation period in accordance with the principles of Article 6.
  • Clare and other members of the local community could start a campaign against the developments using human rights language.

Jackie (health and social care; older people; mental health)

Case Study - Jackie

Jackie is 82 years old and has been living in a local authority residential care home for five years. During this time she has been very happy at the home. There are regular social activities that she really enjoys such as day trips, dance evenings and a poetry group. However, recently these activities have been cut due to staff shortages.

Since this happened, Jackie’s behaviour has become increasingly erratic. She often leaves the home without telling anyone where she is going. One day she is returned to the home by police who are concerned for her welfare, having found her wandering in a local park. To stop this happening again, a lock with a pin code is placed on the door of the home. Only staff are given access to the pin code.

Reveal answers - Jackie

Relevant rights
  • Article 8: right to respect for private life (Jackie and other residents)
  • Article 5: right to liberty (Jackie and other residents)
Duty bearers (e.g. local authority, NHS Trust, police)
  • The residential care home
Absolute/non-absolute rights
  • Neither Article 8 or Article 5 are absolute
Are limitations/restrictions lawful?
  • The care home should consider whether it was really necessary to cut all social activities, and the effect this has on the private life of all the residents. A more proportionate response would be to consider whether some activities could be continued at a lower cost or at no cost. Involving residents in the decision-making could produce creative solutions.
  • The right to liberty is a limited right. One of the situations where it can be limited is if the person has mental health issues. However, the care home must not restrict Jackie’s liberty without following the proper processes (via the Mental Health Act or Mental Capacity Act). They are also acting unlawfully by depriving not just Jackie of her liberty, but also all other residents in the care home.
Suggested action?
  • The care home needs to ensure that all residents who are not covered by the Mental Health Act or Mental Capacity Act are given access to the pin code, and should consider whether the pin code is necessary.
  • The local residents could request that the council extend its consultation period in accordance with the principles of Article 6.
  • Jackie, the other residents (and/or advocates working on their behalf) could point out to the residential care home that the lack of social activities may infringe on their human rights.

Tomas (asylum; transgender; mental health)

Case Study - Tomas

Tomas is an asylum seeker from Iran. Before seeking asylum Tomas began to have operative treatment to become a man. He was in the middle of receiving hormone therapy when he had to flee Iran to seek asylum in the UK. Now in the UK, he is desperate for some follow up medical advice but cannot access this or continue his treatment due to his status as an asylum seeker. All the refugee and asylum support groups are ill-equipped to deal with transgender issues and one adviser told him that what he had done was ‘unnatural’. He also cannot find any transgender support groups in his area and is beginning to feel depressed and anxious. He also feels unsafe in his hostel, due to numerous threats from other male asylum seekers. Tomas has told the hostel staff and a local GP that he is depressed and considering suicide.

Reveal answers - Tomas

Relevant rights
  • Article 8, right to respect for private life (Tomas)
  • Article 14: right not to be discriminated against (Tomas)

and potentially

  • Article 2, right to life (Tomas)
  • Article 3, right not to be treated in an inhuman or degrading way (Tomas)
Duty bearers (e.g. local authority, NHS Trust, police)
  • Government in respect of policy on medical treatment
  • The GP and potentially the hostel guards (if publicly funded) have a positive obligation to protect Tomas.
Absolute/non-absolute rights
  • Article 3 is an absolute right. The other rights are not absolute.
Are limitations/restrictions lawful?
  • The fact that Tomas’s hormone treatment has been stopped midway through treatment will clearly have an impact on his right to respect for private life. The government currently has a policy only to provide emergency medical treatment to asylum seekers. Do you think this policy is proportionate?
Suggested action?
  • The local support groups do not have direct duties under the Human Rights Act. But there is clearly a support gap here for Tomas and they should consider using a human rights approach to look internally at their own services and staff attitudes.
  • Situations such as Tomas’s could be used in a campaign to highlight the lack of available medical advice and treatment for asylum seekers and the impact that can have on their human rights.
  • There may be potential for Tomas to use human rights in his asylum case to support him to stay in the UK – although we would need to know more about the particular case.

 

Where to next?

The first five chapters of this toolkit will hopefully have given you a good general overview of what human rights are and how they might be relevant for your work. But how do you actually go about applying them in an everyday context? Where do you start? And how can you find out more?

Here are a few initial ideas of how you could start using human rights:

 

Tell us what you think: we see this toolkit as a work in progress and we are really keen to hear your views. What works and what doesn't? What should we include that we haven't included? What shouldn't we include that we have included? How could we make it more exciting, interesting or accessible?

Let us know your thoughts via our online evaluation form.